First, students who are cognitively challenged no matter the background, are engaged in their classwork; second, students, no matter what background they come from achieve at higher levels when they are in "an intellectually challenging curriculum; third, "equity gaps" are diminished when they are engaged in their work. From the reading, I am understanding that all students are capable of being successful in academics, but there are factors that determine who will be successful and who will not.
This book focuses mainly on middle school students and how literacy affect their learning success. Literacy is where the students grasp new knowledge by using different strategies.
Discourse plays an important part in our students' learning, discourse is not used in particular but it states that the students' will learn to use language in different social situations. Students need to develop the spoken and written language of a content to do well in assessments. We all know that ELLs perform low than their "native-English-speaking peers" and so teachers need to learn to use different strategies to assist ELL students.
Two important elements the author mentions is prior knowledge and scaffolding.
There are 7 Intellectual Practices:
- Practice 1 - Students engage with the key ideas and concepts of the discipline in ways that reflect how "experts" in the field think and reason
- Practice 2 - Students transform what they have learned into a different form for use in a new content or for a different audience
- Practice 3 - Students make links between concrete knowledge and abstract theoretical knowledge
- Practice 4 - Students engage in substantive conversation
- Practice 5 - Students make connections between the spoken and written language of the subject and other discipline-related ways of making meaning
- Practice 6 - Students take a critical stance toward knowledge and information
- Practice 7 - Students use metalanguage in the context of learning about other things
Apprenticeship is the most natural way to learn and should be used with ELL students daily. Also "Rich Tasks" will connect the students' learning to the real world.
yes you are right. second language learners need a different strategies to learn a second language. i think it is unjust to teach all of students using the same methods.
ReplyDeleteWhat is most interesting to me is that these strategies and practices need to be taught, and scaffold for the students. I like the 7 practices and can see how it could help students be able to see things and especially transform the content to another arena would help them so much.
ReplyDeleteI have been working with second language learners for about six-years now and it is saddening to see how most teachers block them out. As a tutor I heard countless horror stories from my students and all I could think about was those students deserve the right to learn like everyone else. If a teacher can adapt to all the students in the class, s/he can assure the students success...good post.
ReplyDeleteI am a second language learner myself and I can reflect on some of these strategies when I started 22 years ago. My primary Discourse did mobilize explicit Meta-Knowledge and did not help me verbalize the words, acts, values, and attitudes. Gee states that meta-knowledge helps manipulate one’s first language. Meta-knowledge happens by exposure to another language, having to translate and relate it to your own language, which can cause to consciously become aware of how the first language works. This is what happened to and I became more critical of my primary language.
ReplyDeleteThis is all new to me. The book that I am reading connects well with your ideas. My book talks about Social conversation and Academic language (classroom). ELL students typically become proficient in social conversation but take about 7 years for classroom proficiency. Why? Exactly as your 7 points suggest; there is no conversational academic language in class. Typical learning is done by question /answer. Not a discussion among students.
ReplyDeleteAll this is very cool to me. That more than one book talks about a similar solution for helping ELL students, and all students for that matter.
Thanks for the post!!
This is all new to me. The book that I am reading connects well with your ideas. My book talks about Social conversation and Academic language (classroom). ELL students typically become proficient in social conversation but take about 7 years for classroom proficiency. Why? Exactly as your 7 points suggest; there is no conversational academic language in class. Typical learning is done by question /answer. Not a discussion among students.
ReplyDeleteAll this is very cool to me. That more than one book talks about a similar solution for helping ELL students, and all students for that matter.
Thanks for the post!!
Hi Merlinda,
ReplyDeleteAs an ELL myself, who have only been here in the States for two years, I am striving for involving into the English world. Although this book is mainly about middle school students, I was wondering if these strategies and concepts could also work for adult learners?
I must admit that I thought students whose parents speak languages other than English would mostly be bilingual, unless they immigrates after they are born in the original country. If they are born in the States, I presume that they would receive English or Bilingual education. I was wondering how many students who suffer in middle school are immigrants? Or they didn't get English education here? Or the English or Bilingual education they have been through before entering middle schools didn't work well?